This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Sandven, T. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Autonomy, Adaptation, and Rationality—A Critical Discussion of Jon Elster’s Concept of "Sour Grapes," Part I

STEP (Group for Studies in Technology, Innovation and Economic Policy), Oslo

This article argues against Jon Elster’s contention that there is a fundamental incompatibility between, on the one hand, autonomy and rationality, and, on the other hand, adaptation to the conditions of one’s existence in the sense that one’s desires or preferences are adjusted to what it is possible to achieve. It is claimed that Elster’s conclusions are premised on a defective conception of human faculties and powers, including a defective conception of human experience and rationality. Moreover, the claim is made that these defects are also characteristic of "rational choice theory" more generally.

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 29, No. 1, 3-31 (1999)
DOI: 10.1177/004839319902900101


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?