This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Wible, J. R. Articles by Dietrich, S. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Innovative Therapies, Suspended Trials, and the Economics of Clinical Research

Facilitated Communication and Biomedical Cases

University of New Hampshire

Susan Dietrich

University of North Carolina at Greensboro

Most approaches to the philosophy of the natural and social sciences are based on completed scientific investigations. However, there are many important cases in science in which testing is incomplete. These cases are termed suspended trials and are particularly significant in biomedical and allied health fields. Initially, the authors’ interest in suspended trials was piqued by a controversial method for assisting autistic children known as facilitated communication. This article examines facilitated communication and other examples of suspended trials from the perspective of an economics of science and game theory. The model is consistent with recent evolutionary approaches to the philosophy of the natural and social sciences and with recent contributions to an economic understanding of science.

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 3, 275-309 (2002)
DOI: 10.1177/004839310203200301


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?