This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (15) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Bunge, M. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

How Does It Work?

The Search for Explanatory Mechanisms

McGill University

This article addresses the following problems: What is a mechanism, how can it be discovered, and what is the role of the knowledge of mechanisms in scientific explanation and technological control? The proposed answers are these. A mechanism is one of the processes in a concrete system that makes it what it is — for example, metabolism in cells, interneuronal connections in brains, work in factories and offices, research in laboratories, and litigation in courts of law. Because mechanisms are largely or totally imperceptible, they must be conjectured. Once hypothesized they help explain, because a deep scientific explanation is an answer to a question of the form, "How does it work, that is, what makes it tick—what are its mechanisms?" Thus, by contrast with the subsumption of particulars under a generalization, an explanation proper consists in unveiling some lawful mechanism, as when political stability is explained by either coercion, public opinion manipulation, or democratic participation. Finding mechanisms satisfies not only the yearning for understanding, but also the need for control.

Key Words: explanation • function • mechanism • process • system • systemism

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, 182-210 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393103262550


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. Demetriou The Realist Approach to Explanatory Mechanisms in Social Science: More than a Heuristic? Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2009; 39(3): 440 - 462. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. May and T. Finch Implementing, Embedding, and Integrating Practices: An Outline of Normalization Process Theory Sociology, June 1, 2009; 43(3): 535 - 554. [Abstract] [PDF]

				A. Pickel Rethinking Systems Theory: A Programmatic Introduction Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 391 - 407. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Walby Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 2007; 37(4): 449 - 470. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. Whitley Understanding Differences: Searching for the Social Processes that Construct and Reproduce Variety in Science and Economic Organization Organization Studies, August 1, 2006; 27(8): 1153 - 1177. [Abstract] [PDF]

				S. Sadovnikov Systemism, Social Laws, and the Limits of Social Theory: Themes Out of Mario Bunge's: The Sociology-Philosophy Connection Philosophy of the Social Sciences, December 1, 2004; 34(4): 536 - 587. [Abstract] [PDF]

				P. James Systemism, Social Mechanisms, and Scientific Progress: A Case Study of the International Crisis Behavior Project Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2004; 34(3): 352 - 370. [Abstract] [PDF]

				R. K. Sawyer The Mechanisms of Emergence Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 260 - 282. [Abstract] [PDF]

				C. Wight Theorizing the Mechanisms of Conceptual and Semiotic Space Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 283 - 299. [Abstract] [PDF]