Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sawyer, R. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Mechanisms of Emergence

R. Keith Sawyer

Washington University

This article focuses on emergence in social systems. The author begins by proposing a new tool to explore the mechanisms of social emergence: multi agent–based computer simulation. He then draws on philosophy of mind to develop an account of social emergence that raises potential problems for the methodological individualism of both social mechanism and of multi agent simulation. He then draws on various complexity concepts to propose a set of criteria whereby one can determine whether a given social mechanism generates emergent properties, in the sense that their explanation cannot be reduced to a mechanistic account of individuals and their interactions. This combined account helps to resolve the competing claims of methodological individualists and social realists. The author’s conclusion is that the scope of mechanistic explanation may be limited due to the extreme complexity of many social systems.

Key Words: emergence • mechanism • computer simulation • methodological individualism • social realism

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 34, No. 2, 260-282 (2004)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393103262553
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
C. Demetriou
The Realist Approach to Explanatory Mechanisms in Social Science: More than a Heuristic?
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2009; 39(3): 440 - 462.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Organization StudiesHome page
K. Pajunen
The Nature of Organizational Mechanisms
Organization Studies, November 1, 2008; 29(11): 1449 - 1468.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
P. James
Systemism, Social Mechanisms, and Scientific Progress: A Case Study of the International Crisis Behavior Project
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2004; 34(3): 352 - 370.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
C. Wight
Theorizing the Mechanisms of Conceptual and Semiotic Space
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, June 1, 2004; 34(2): 283 - 299.
[Abstract] [PDF]