This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Fay, B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

For Science in the Social Sciences

Wesleyan University

All three of the books under review—Science and Social Science by Malcolm Williams,Rethinking Science by Jan Faye, and Open the Social Sciences by the members of the Gulbenkian Commission on the Restructuring of the Social Sciences (Immanuel Wallerstein, chair)—argue for a broadly naturalist approach in which the social sciences are seen as of a piece with the natural sciences. Fortunately, all three do so in a discriminating way that avoids simple options and that appreciates the important ways the social-scientific disciplines require their own approach. Open the Social Sciences in particular also contains detailed and wise advice as to how the contemporary social sciences should proceed if they want to fulfill their ambition to explain human social behavior in a scientific way.

Key Words: science • social science • scientific method • unity of the sciences • reductionism • explanation • interpretation • complexity theory

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 36, No. 2, 227-240 (2006)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393106287243


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				V. Cojanu The logic of inquiry in social sciences, the case of economics in particular Social Science Information, December 1, 2009; 48(4): 587 - 607. [Abstract] [PDF]