Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
0048393108325331v1
39/3/408    most recent
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Reydon, T. A. C.
Right arrow Articles by Scholz, M.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Why Organizational Ecology Is Not a Darwinian Research Program

Thomas A. C. Reydon

Leibniz University of Hannover, Germany

Markus Scholz

Leibniz University of Hannover, Germany

Organizational ecology is commonly seen as a Darwinian research program that seeks to explain the diversity of organizational structures, properties and behaviors as the product of selection in past social environments in a similar manner as evolutionary biology seeks to explain the forms, properties and behaviors of organisms as consequences of selection in past natural environments. We argue that this explanatory strategy does not succeed because organizational ecology theory lacks an evolutionary mechanism that could be identified as the principal cause of organizational diversity. The "evolution" of organizational populations by means of selection, which organizational ecologists put forward as the mechanism responsible for the extant diversity of organizational forms, is not evolution in any proper sense, because organizational populations do not have what it takes to participate in evolutionary processes. This implies that organizational ecology is not a Darwinian research program and that it cannot explain organizational diversity.

Key Words: Darwinism • evolution • organization theory • organizational ecology • organizational systematics • population ecology of organizations

This version was published on September 1, 2009

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 39, No. 3, 408-439 (2009)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393108325331


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Philosophy of the Social SciencesHome page
J. Lemos
In Defense of Organizational Evolution: A Reply to Reydon and Scholz
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, September 1, 2009; 39(3): 463 - 474.
[Abstract] [PDF]