This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Anderson, D. C. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Some Organizational Features in the Local Production of a Plausible Text*

Given that written texts are characterized by indexicality and incompleteness; how is it that they are read and followed then judged adequate? In particular how are social scientific arguments read as plausible under such conditions?

It is suggested that the very natural language that renders such arguments in principle problematic, provides a resource in its textual particulars for the repair of indexicality. The article analyzes some local textual features with methods borrowed from conversational analysis to demonstrate three reader/writer strategies 'age orientation', the categorization of a population as more than incidentally juvenile; establishing 'author authority' ; and 'investing' (apparently senseless actors with 'purpose'.

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 8, No. 2, 113-135 (1978)
DOI: 10.1177/004839317800800201


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Lloyd The Language of Reproduction: Is it Doctored? Qual Health Res, May 1, 1997; 7(2): 184 - 201. [Abstract] [PDF]

				Bibliography Current Sociology, March 1, 1994; 42(1): 129 - 148.

				J. O'Neill A Realist Model of Knowledge: With a Phenomenological Deconstruction of its Model of Man Philosophy of the Social Sciences, March 1, 1986; 16(1): 1 - 19. [PDF]