|
Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
|
Rethinking Systems TheoryA Programmatic Introduction
Andreas Pickel
Trent University, Peterborough, Ontario, Canada
Does systems theory need rethinking? Most social scientists would probably say no. It had its run, was debated critically, and found wanting. If at all, it should be treated historically. Why then might systems theory need rethinking, as the title of this symposium claims? The reason is that, unlike in the natural and biosocial sciences, any conception of system in the social sciences has remained suspect in the wake of problematic Parsonian and cybernetic systems theories. The premise of this special issue is that abandoning conceptions of systems has imposed a high price on the social sciences: a lack of ontologies and methodologies that are both philosophically profound and scientifically defensible. It has left social scientists who choose to ignore ontology in their theoretical and empirical work defenseless against enterprising settlers from a variety of humanities and social science disciplines who attack mainstream work with—often simplistic and naïve, but nevertheless fundamental—philosophical arguments, whether anti-scientific postmodernists or pseudo-scientific rational choice theorists. The goal of this special issue is to showcase new and original work that contributes to a rethinking of systems theory by taking the conception of systems seriously. This introduction offers a programmatic statement of a systemic ontology and methodology as well as a brief general outline and examples of what a systems-based approach in the social sciences entails.
Key Words: systems theory systemism systemic approach complexity theory self-organization emergentism paradigms social mechanisms Mario Bunge
References
- Bunge, M. 2004. How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 182-210.[Abstract]
- ———. 1979a. A systems concept of society: Beyond individualism and holism. Theory and Decision 10:13-30.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- ———. 1979b. Treatise on basic philosophy, vol. 4. A world of systems. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer/ Reidel.
- Boudon, R. 1998. Social mechanisms without black boxes. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Elias, N. [1939] 2000. The civilizing process: Sociogenetic and psychogenetic investigations. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
- Elster, J. 2007. Explaining social behavior: More nuts and bolts for the social sciences. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Hedström, P. 2005. Dissecting the social: On the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Hedström, P., and R. Swedberg, eds. 1998. Social mechanisms: An analytical approach to social theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Laszlo, E. 1972. Introduction to systems philosophy. New York: Gordon and Breach.
- Lazega, E. 2001. The collegial phenomenon: The social mechanisms of cooperation among peers in a corporate law partnership. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Lewis, M.D. 2005. Bridging emotion theory and neurobiology through dynamic systems modeling. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28 (2):169-245.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
- Machado, N., and T. Burns. 1998. Complex social organization: Multiple organizing modes, structural incongruence, and mechanisms of integration. Public Administration 76 (2): 355-385.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Mayntz, R. 2004. Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 237-259.[Abstract]
- McAdam, D., S. G. Tarrow, and C. Tilly. 2001. Dynamics of contention. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Norkus, Z. 2005. Mechanisms as miracle makers? The rise and inconsistencies of the "mechanismic approach" in social science and history. History and Theory 44:348-372.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- Pickel, A. 2006. The problem of order in the global age: Systems and mechanisms. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
- ———. 2005. The habitus process: A biopsychosocial conception. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 35 (4): 437-461.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
- ———, ed. 2004. Systems and Mechanisms: A Symposium on Mario Bunge's Philosophy of Social Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 18 (2 and 3).
- Reiss, J. 2007. Do we need mechanisms in the social sciences? Philosophy of the Social Sciences 2 (June): 163-184.
- Sztompka, P. 1979. Sociological dilemmas: Toward a dialectic paradigm. New York: Academic Press.
- Tilly, C. 2004. Social boundary mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 211-236.[Abstract]
- ———. 2005. Identities, boundaries, and social ties. Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers.
- Wartofsky, M.W. 1976. How to begin again: Medical therapies for the philosophy of science. PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, vol. 2: Symposia and Invited Papers: 109-122.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 4,
391-407 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393107307809

CiteULike Complore Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter What's this?
|
|