Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
Philosophy of the Social Sciences
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

Complexity Theory, Systems Theory, and Multiple Intersecting Social Inequalities

Sylvia Walby

Lancaster University

This article contributes to the revision of the concept of system in social theory using complexity theory. The old concept of social system is widely discredited; a new concept of social system can more adequately constitute an explanatory framework. Complexity theory offers the toolkit needed for this paradigm shift in social theory. The route taken is not via Luhmann, but rather the insights of complexity theorists in the sciences are applied to the tradition of social theory inspired by Marx, Weber, and Simmel. The article contributes to the theorization of intersectionality in social theory as well as to the philosophy of social science. It addresses the challenge of theorizing the intersection of multiple complex social inequalities, exploring the various alternative approaches, before rethinking the concept of social system. It investigates and applies, for the first time, the implications of complexity theory for the analysis of multiple intersecting social inequalities.

Key Words: complexity theory • inequality • intersectionality • social theory

References

  • Abbot, Andrew. 2001. Time matters: On theory and method. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
  • Althusser, Louis. 1971. Lenin and philosophy and other essays. London: New Left Books.
  • Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at large: Cultural dimensions of globalization. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Archer, Margaret S. 1995. Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Arthur, W. Brian. 1994. Increasing returns and path dependence in the economy. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
  • Barrett, Michele, and Anne Phillips, eds. 1992 Destabilizing theory: Contemporary feminist debates. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Benhabib, Seyla. 1999 Sexual difference and collective identities: The new global constellation. Signs 24 (2): 335-361.[CrossRef]
  • Brah, Avtar, and Ann Phoenix. 2004. Ain't I a woman? Revisiting intersectionality. Journal of International Women's Studies 5 (3): 75-86.
  • Braidotti, Rosi. 1994. Nomadic subjects: Embodiment and sexual di ference in contemporary feminist theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Brenner, Neil. 1999. Beyond state-centrism? Space, territoriality, and geographical scale in globalization studies. Theory and Society 28:39-78.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Bunge, Mario. 2001. Systems and emergence, rationality and imprecision, free-wheeling and evidence, science and ideology: Social science and its philosophy according to van den Berg. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 31 (3): 404-423.[Free Full Text]
  • ———. 2004. How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34 (2): 182-210.[Abstract]
  • Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. New York: Routledge.
  • Bertalanffy, Ludwig von. 1968. General systems theory: Foundations, development, applications. Revised edition. New York: George Braziller.
  • Byrne, David. 1998. Complexity theory and the social sciences: An introduction. London: Routledge.
  • ———. 2002. Interpreting quantitative data. London: Sage.
  • Capra, Fritjof. 1997 The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter. London: Flamingo.
  • Cilliers, Paul. 1998. Complexity and postmodernism: Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
  • Collins, Patricia Hill. 1998. It's all in the family: Intersections of gender, race, and nation. Hypatia 13 (3): 62-82.
  • Connell, Robert W. 1987. Gender and power: Society, the person, sexual politics. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Conte, Rosaria, and Nigel Gilbert. 1995. Introduction: Computer simulation for social theory. In Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life, edited by Nigel Gilbert and Rosaria Conte. London: UCL Press.
  • Crenshaw, Kimberlé Williams. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43 (6): 1241-99.[CrossRef]
  • Crompton, Rosemary, and Michael Mann, eds. 1986. Gender and stratification. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Cudworth, Erika. 2005. Developing ecofeminist theory: The complexity of di ference. London: Palgrave.
  • David, Paul. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review (Papers and Proceedings of the ninety-Seventh annual Meeting of the American Economic Association) 75 (2): 332-37.
  • De Landa, Manuel. 2000. A thousand years of nonlinear history. New York: Swerve Editions.
  • Durkheim, Emile. 1966. the rules of sociological method. New York: Free Press.
  • Emirbayer, Mustafa. 1997. Manifesto for a relational sociology. American Journal of Sociology 103 (2): 281-317.[CrossRef]
  • Esping-Andersen, Gøsta. 1990. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • ———. 1999. Social foundations of postindustrial economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Felski, Rita. 1997. The doxa of difference. Signs 23 (1): 1-22.[CrossRef]
  • Foucault, Michel. 1997. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. London: Penguin.
  • Giddens, Anthony. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Gilbert, Nigel. 1995 Emergence in social simulation. In Artificial societies: The computer simulation of social life, edited by Nigel Gilbert and Rosaria Conte. London: UCL Press.
  • Gottfried, Heidi. 2000. Compromising positions: Emergent neo-Fordism and embedded gender contracts. British Journal of Sociology 51 (2): 235-259.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  • Hartmann, Heidi. 1976. Capitalism, patriarchy and job segregation by sex. Signs 1:137-70.[CrossRef]
  • Harvey, David. 1989. The condition of postmodernity: An enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • ———. 2001. Chaos and complexity: Their bearing on social policy research. Social Issues 1, 2. http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/harvey.htm.
  • Holland, John H. 1995. Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • ———. 2000. Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Jakobsen, Janet R. 1998. Working alliances and the politics of di ference: Diversity and feminist ethics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Jessop, Bob. 2002. The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • Kauffman, Stuart A. 1993. The origins of order: Self-organization and selection in evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Knodt, Eva M. 1995. Foreword. In Social systems by Niklas Luhmann. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Lash, Scott, and John Urry. 1994. Economies of signs and space. London: Sage.
  • Latour, Bruno. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Liebowitz, S.J., and Stephen E. Margolis. 1995. Path dependence, lock-in, and history. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 11 (1): 205-226.[Free Full Text]
  • López, José, and John Scott. 2000. Social structure. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
  • Luhmann, Niklas. 1985. A sociological theory of law. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
  • ———. 1990. The autopoiesis of social systems. In Essays on self-reference. New York: Columbia University Press.
  • ———. 1995. Social systems. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • ———. 2000. Art as a social system. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  • Lyotard, Jean-Francois. 1978. The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.
  • Mahoney, James. 2000. Path dependency in historical sociology. Theory and society 29:507-548.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Maturana, Humberto R., and Francisco J. Varela. 1980. Autopoeisis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • McCall, Leslie. 2005. The complexity of intersectionality. Signs 30 (3): 1771-1800.[CrossRef]
  • McLennan, Gregor. 2006. Sociological cultural studies: Reflexivity and positivity in the human sciences. London: Palgrave.
  • Medd, Will. 2001. Making (Dis)connections: Complexity and the policy process? Social Issues 1, 2. http://www.whb.co.uk/socialissues/wm.htm.
  • Mies, Maria. 1986. Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale: Women in the international division of labour. London: Zed.
  • Mirza, Heidi Safia, ed. 1997 Black British feminism: A reader. London: Routledge.
  • Mohanty, Chandra Talpade. 1991. Under Western eyes: Feminist scholarship and colonial discourses. In Third World women and the politics of feminism, edited by Chandra Talpade Mohanty, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
  • Nee, Victor, and Yang Cao. 1999. Path dependent societal transformation: Stratification in hybrid mixed economies. Theory and Society 28:799-834.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • North, Douglass C. 1990. Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Parsons, Talcott. 1951. The social system. New York: The Free Press.
  • Phizacklea, Annie. 1990. Unpacking the Fashion Industry. London: Routledge.
  • Phoenix, Ann, and Pamela Pattynama. 2006. Editorial: Intersectionality. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 187-192.[Free Full Text]
  • Pierson, Paul. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251-268.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Pollert, Anna. 1996. Gender and class revisited: The poverty of "patriarchy." Sociology 30 (4): 639-659.[Abstract]
  • Prigogine, Ilya. 1997. The end of certainty: Time, chaos, and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.
  • Prigogine, Ilya, and Isabelle Stengers. 1984. Order out of chaos: man's new dialogue with nature. London: Heinemann.
  • Prins, Bauke. 2006. Narrative accounts of origins: A blind spot in the intersectional approach. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 277-290.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Reed, Michael, and David L. Harvey. 1992. The new science and the old: Complexity and realism in the social sciences. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 22 (4): 353-380.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • Rihani, Samir. 2001. Complex systems theory and development practice: Understanding nonlinear realities. New York: Zed Books.
  • Sassen, Saskia. 1998. Globalization and its discontents. New York: The New Press.
  • Sayer, Andrew. 1997. Essentialism, social constructionism and beyond. Sociological Review 45 (3): 453-487.[CrossRef][Web of Science]
  • ———. (2000) Realism and social science. London: Sage.
  • Scholte, Jan Aarte. 2000 Globalisation: A critical introduction. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
  • Scott, John. 2000. Social network analysis: A handbook. London: Sage.
  • Simmel, Georg. 1955. Conflict: The web of group affiliations. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
  • Somers, Margaret R. 1998. "We're no angels": Realism, rational choice, and relationality in social science. American Journal of Sociology 104 (3): 722-84.[CrossRef]
  • Thrift, Nigel. 1999. The place of complexity. Theory, Culture and Society 16 (3): 31-69.
  • Urry, John. 2003. Global complexity. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • ———. 2005. The complexity turn. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5): 1-14.[Web of Science]
  • Verloo, Mieke. 2006. Multiple inequalities, intersectionality and the European Union. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 211-228.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  • Walby, Sylvia. 1986. Patriarchy at work. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
  • ———. 1990. Theorizing patriarchy. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • ———. 2003. The myth of the nation-state: Theorizing society and polities in a global era. Sociology 37 (1): 531-548.
  • ———. 2004. The European Union and gender equality: Emergent varieties of gender regime. Social politics 11 (1): 4-29.[Abstract]
  • ———. 2008 (forthcoming). Globalization and inequalities: Complexity and contested modernities. London: Sage.
  • Waldrop, M. Mitchell. 1992. Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. London: Penguin.
  • Westwood, Sallie. 1984. All day, every day: Factory and family in the making of women's lives. London: Pluto.
  • Wynne, Brian. 2005. Reflexing complexity: Post-genomic knowledge and reductionist returns in public science. Theory, Culture and Society 22 (5): 67-94.[CrossRef]
  • Yuval-Davis, Nira. 2006. Intersectionality and feminist politics. European Journal of Women's Studies 13 (3): 193-209.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

Philosophy of the Social Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 4, 449-470 (2007)
DOI: 10.1177/0048393107307663
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?



This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Free Full Text (Free PDF) Free
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Walby, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?